1-Graffitis
Se llama graffiti a varias formas de inscripción o pintura, generalmente sobre propiedades públicas o privadas ajenas.
En el lenguaje común, graffiti incluye lo que también se llama pintadas: el resultado de pintar en las paredes letreros, frecuentemente de contenido político o social, sin permiso.
Dentro de la cultura hip hop, se llama grafo o graffiti a unos tipos específicos. En este sentido, una pintada política no sería grafiti. El grafiti es un arte, uno de los 4 elementos de la cultura hip-hop.
Cada escritor desarrolla un lenguaje y estilo particular que hace referencia a símbolos de su tribu cada lenguaje constituye un argot.
Los mensajes hacen referencia a expresiones particulares que expresan diferentes fines.
Los tags que son especies de firmas que se repiten en las calles de la ciudad como el resto de las creaciones buscan apropiarse, marcar y ser reconocidos en la ciudad.
Todos los tipos de personas lo están haciendo siempre ha sido de esa manera, no hay una raza que haga mas que otra, no hay una edad especifica que este asociada con el graffiti ni tampoco un grupo socioeconómico. El graffiti es uno de los pocos movimientos que involucra personas distintas con una meta en la mente, pintar en todos lados.
El movimiento del graffiti tuvo su máximo esplendor a comienzos de los años ochenta, momento en el que se hacen las obras más agresivas. Pero en cuanto los artistas provenientes de las calles convierten su actividad en algo rutinario y otros con preparación artística se incorporan a la "moda" del graffiti, las obras resultan triviales, carentes de toda importancia.
El movimiento del graffiti tuvo su máximo esplendor a comienzos de los años ochenta, momento en el que se hacen las obras más agresivas. Pero en cuanto los artistas provenientes de las calles convierten su actividad en algo rutinario y otros con preparación artística se incorporan a la "moda" del graffiti, las obras resultan triviales, carentes de toda importancia.
En mi opinión los graffitis son una forma de expresar lo que se siente y piensa ya sea de la sociedad de la politica o hasta de temas personales y al ser algo ilegal lo hace que se conserve en el tiempo.
Graffiti
It's called graffiti to various forms of inscription or painting, usuallyon public or private property of others.
In common parlance, graffiti includes what is also called painted: the result of signs painted on the walls, often political or social content without permission.
Within hip hop culture, graffiti is called network or to specific types.In this sense, a policy would not be painted graffiti. Graffiti is an art,one of the 4 elements of hip-hop culture.
Each writer develops a particular style and language that refers tosymbols of each tribe is a slang language.
The messages refer to particular expressions that allow for different purposes.
The tags which are a kind of firms that are repeated on the streetsof the city as the rest of the creations look appropriate, mark andbe recognized in the city.
All types of people are doing has always been that way, there is norace that does more than any other, there is no specific age that is associated with graffiti nor socioeconomic group. Graffiti is one of the few movements involving different people with one goal inmind, paint everywhere.
The graffiti movement had its heyday in the early eighties, when theworks are made more aggressive. But as artists from the streetsbecome a routine activity in artistic training and others are incorporated into the "fashion " of graffiti, the works are trivial, lacking any importance.
In my opinion, the graffiti is a way to express what you feel andthink whether the company policy or even personal issues andwhen you do something illegal to keep in time
In common parlance, graffiti includes what is also called painted: the result of signs painted on the walls, often political or social content without permission.
Within hip hop culture, graffiti is called network or to specific types.In this sense, a policy would not be painted graffiti. Graffiti is an art,one of the 4 elements of hip-hop culture.
Each writer develops a particular style and language that refers tosymbols of each tribe is a slang language.
The messages refer to particular expressions that allow for different purposes.
The tags which are a kind of firms that are repeated on the streetsof the city as the rest of the creations look appropriate, mark andbe recognized in the city.
All types of people are doing has always been that way, there is norace that does more than any other, there is no specific age that is associated with graffiti nor socioeconomic group. Graffiti is one of the few movements involving different people with one goal inmind, paint everywhere.
The graffiti movement had its heyday in the early eighties, when theworks are made more aggressive. But as artists from the streetsbecome a routine activity in artistic training and others are incorporated into the "fashion " of graffiti, the works are trivial, lacking any importance.
In my opinion, the graffiti is a way to express what you feel andthink whether the company policy or even personal issues andwhen you do something illegal to keep in time
2-¿vandalismo o arte?
Desde los principios de la humanidad, el hombre ha buscado apoyo en materias de expresión como su medio de desahogo. Puede ser por simple diversión, pero también, puede estar destinado a expandir opiniones frente a distintas temáticas que nos afectan, tanto como individuos o grupo social. Hoy en día, los medios de expresión son perfectamente clasificables. El más frecuente utilizado sería el periodístico; y me atrevo a decir, el más popular. Diarios, revistas, programas de TV, de radio, etc. Por supuesto todo tiene un límite. La censura tiene el rol de imponer ese límite que no siempre agrada a una mayoría. Otro medio en el que sus orígenes datan de miles de años atrás, es la pintura. Comenzó con los jeroglíficos de las cavernas y fue evolucionando hasta ser una de las más importantes ramas del arte. Pero no es ni de los diarios, ni de las pinturas de las que quiero hablar. Quiero plantear una problemática muy actual y que nos afecta a todos. Donde la libertad de expresión llegó a interferir en personas totalmente ajenas a su uso.
Todos conocemos lo que son los Graffitis, aunque sea los hemos visto sin saber lo que son. Nacieron como simples “pintadas” en los metros de las principales ciudades del mundo, y fueron considerados, por muchos políticos y autoridades, como una verdadera plaga que había que exterminar. Pero en el siglo XXI, son aceptados como una expresión artística más y una seña de la cultura contemporánea. Si buscamos un poco de información sobre la historia de los Graffitis, nos encontraremos con afirmaciones como ésta. Se asegura que en una primera etapa, sus autores eran perseguidos y totalmente juzgados. Hoy en día, se ha popularizado tanto que ya no es la “pintada” de unos pocos; sino, el arte de una o más culturas.
Es arte, claro. Dicen que es la expresión de la creatividad de nuestra gente. Que tiene valor artístico porque muestra la trascendencia del pensamiento de la cultura y de la sociedad. Y además se dice que es el método de expresión más directo y accesible para llegar a grandes masas en poco tiempo. Hay hasta teorías psicológicas de su utilidad. Pero lo que esa gente no se ha puesto a pensar es en el atropello que se está haciendo con su práctica demedida. Sería ingenuo decir que sólo hacen graffitis en zonas habilitadas por el gobierno. Es cosa de dar un paseo por tu propio barrio y verás que hay zonas urbanas llenas de graffitis; en las casas, los negocios, las micros, empresas. En fin, un verdadero atropello a la propiedad privada. Es por eso que ante la ley es un delito. No creo que haya duda de la autenticidad de esa ley. Cada uno tiene el derecho de elegir su quiere o no tener graffitis en las partes de su propiedad, ya sea casa, micro, etc. Entonces, ¿qué necesidad de expresión puede decidir por los bienes de otras personas? ¿Acaso estamos obligados a “escucharlos”? ¿Acaso somos discriminadores por querer defender nuestros derechos? Creo que no hay posible argumento que pueda refutar esta idea. Me gustaría saber cómo reaccionaría un “graffitero” de la calle si voy y le empiezo a tirar basura en su casa, o por último en su cabeza. Ah noo, es que ahí ya estaría agrediendo sin causa. ¿Pero pasar a llevar un derecho de otra persona no es importante sea como sea? El punto es que se está invadiendo la libertad de otra persona en algo que no tiene por qué verse involucrada.
Las culturas tienen todo el derecho de expresarse. Eso nadie lo niega. El no permitirles hacer graffitis en ningún lado sería hacer con ellos lo mismo que hacen con nosotros: pasar a llevar sus derechos. El problema radica en el medio físico que ocupan para hacerlo. No pueden decir que la sociedad los censura. Para ello hay lugares especiales que se les administra para que puedan expresarse. Si no son suficientes, perfecto. Luchen por conseguir más, pero legalmente. Es fácil quedarse de brazos cruzados y acusar a las autoridades de represoras. Es fácil seguir cometiendo el delito a excusa de que no tienen suficiente apoyo. Pero yo me pregunto: ¿qué han hecho ustedes por ese apoyo? El día que vea a masas grandes en todo el mundo en protesta por la poca cantidad de lugares habilitados para hacer graffitis, y los gobiernos no los apoyen, ese día, quemaré este escrito y me uniré a ustedes. Porque no se trata de si me gustan o no sus dibujos, se trata de la preservación de nuestros derechos que nos llevan a una vida en sociedad más grata y prometedora. Hasta el momento los seguiré considerando unos vándalos. Todo depende de ustedes.
¿Vandalism or art?
Since the beginning of mankind, man has sought support in matters of expression as their means of relief. It may be just for fun, but also can be designed to expand to different opinions regarding issues that affect us both as individuals or social group. Today, the means of expression are clearly labeled. The most frequently used would be the newspaper, and I dare say, the most popular.Newspapers, magazines, TV, radio, etc. Of course there are limits.Censorship has a role in imposing this limit is not always pleasing to a majority. Another way in which its origins dating back thousands of years ago, is painting. It began with the hieroglyphs of the cave and evolved into one of the most important branches of art. But it is neither of the newspapers, or the paintings of which I speak. I raise a very current problem that affects us all. Where freedom of expression came to interfere in people totally unrelated to their use.
We all know what are the graffiti, even seen them without knowing what they are. Born as simply "painted" on the meters of the main cities of the world, and were considered by many politicians and authorities, as a plague that had to be exterminated. But in the XXI century, accepted as an artistic expression and a sign of contemporary culture. If we look a little information about the history of graffiti, we find statements like this. Ensures that in a first stage, the authors were persecuted and fully prosecuted. Today has become so popular that it is not "painted" a few, but the art of one or more cultures.
It's art, of course. They say it is the expression of creativity of our people. That has artistic value because it shows the importance of thinking about culture and society. And it is said to be the most direct method of expression and accessible to reach large masses in a short time. There's even psychological theories of utility. But what these people have not thought about is the abuse that is being done with their practice demedida. It would be naive to say that only make graffiti in designated areas by the government. It is something of a walk in your own neighborhood and you'll notice graffiti-filled urban areas, in homes, businesses, micro, businesses. Finally, a real affront to private property. That is why before the law is a crime. I do not think there's any doubt the authenticity of the law. Everyone has the right to choose your want or have no graffiti on the sides of your property, whether home, micro, etc. So, what need of expression may decide for other people's property? Are we required to "listen"? Are we discriminating for wanting to defend our rights? I think there is no possible argument that can refute this idea. I wonder how they would react a "graffiti" street if I go and start throwing garbage at home, or finally in his head. Oh noo, is that there would already be attacking without cause. But trampling on another person's right is not important either way? The point is that it is encroaching on the freedom of another person into something that does not have to be involved.
Cultures have every right to express themselves. Nobody denies that. He did not allow them to make graffiti on any side would do with them just as they do with us, trampling on their rights. The problem lies in the physical environment to make it hold. You can not say that society's censure. For this there are special places that are given to express themselves. If these are not perfect.Struggle for more, but legally. It's easy to sit back and accuse the repressive authorities. It's easy to keep making the excuse that crime does not have enough support. But I wonder: What have you done for this support? The day you see large masses around the world to protest the low number of sites that have to do graffiti, and governments do not support that day, burn this letter and I will join you. It is not about whether or not I like your drawings, it is the preservation of our rights that we have a social life more pleasant and promising. So far the vandals continue considering. Everything depends on you.
We all know what are the graffiti, even seen them without knowing what they are. Born as simply "painted" on the meters of the main cities of the world, and were considered by many politicians and authorities, as a plague that had to be exterminated. But in the XXI century, accepted as an artistic expression and a sign of contemporary culture. If we look a little information about the history of graffiti, we find statements like this. Ensures that in a first stage, the authors were persecuted and fully prosecuted. Today has become so popular that it is not "painted" a few, but the art of one or more cultures.
It's art, of course. They say it is the expression of creativity of our people. That has artistic value because it shows the importance of thinking about culture and society. And it is said to be the most direct method of expression and accessible to reach large masses in a short time. There's even psychological theories of utility. But what these people have not thought about is the abuse that is being done with their practice demedida. It would be naive to say that only make graffiti in designated areas by the government. It is something of a walk in your own neighborhood and you'll notice graffiti-filled urban areas, in homes, businesses, micro, businesses. Finally, a real affront to private property. That is why before the law is a crime. I do not think there's any doubt the authenticity of the law. Everyone has the right to choose your want or have no graffiti on the sides of your property, whether home, micro, etc. So, what need of expression may decide for other people's property? Are we required to "listen"? Are we discriminating for wanting to defend our rights? I think there is no possible argument that can refute this idea. I wonder how they would react a "graffiti" street if I go and start throwing garbage at home, or finally in his head. Oh noo, is that there would already be attacking without cause. But trampling on another person's right is not important either way? The point is that it is encroaching on the freedom of another person into something that does not have to be involved.
Cultures have every right to express themselves. Nobody denies that. He did not allow them to make graffiti on any side would do with them just as they do with us, trampling on their rights. The problem lies in the physical environment to make it hold. You can not say that society's censure. For this there are special places that are given to express themselves. If these are not perfect.Struggle for more, but legally. It's easy to sit back and accuse the repressive authorities. It's easy to keep making the excuse that crime does not have enough support. But I wonder: What have you done for this support? The day you see large masses around the world to protest the low number of sites that have to do graffiti, and governments do not support that day, burn this letter and I will join you. It is not about whether or not I like your drawings, it is the preservation of our rights that we have a social life more pleasant and promising. So far the vandals continue considering. Everything depends on you.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario